Racial Profiling by Police Essay -- Stop and Frisk.

The first side, arguing for stop and frisk, is that it saves lives because the more people stopped the more likely it is that they will find someone with a weapons or drugs. The other side, arguing against stop and frisk, believe that it promotes racial profiling and only people who belong to minority group are stopped.

The lawsuit challenges the NYPD’s practice of racial profiling and unconstitutional stops and frisks. Another organization known as the New York Civil Liberties Union, has created and proposed the Community Safety Act to the New York City Council. This act is said to be the first step toward ending discriminatory practices like stop and frisk.

Racial profiling.Being frisked, arrested, or incarcerated is often a humiliating and degrading process in violates human rights. Many police officers have also been known to abuse their authority. Take for instance. In 2009, police in Detroit, Michigan, conducted a stop and- frisk of Elvis Ware.

Essay about Racial Profiling By Police Should Be Illegal. is Stop and Frisk? The New York City stop-question-and-frisk program is a practice of the New York City Police Department by which police officers stop and question tens of thousands of pedestrians annually, and frisk them for weapons and other contraband (New York City Stop-question-frisk program).

The term racial profiling is defined as the discrimination on the basis of the stereotypes (Harcourt 31). The racial profiling is explained in various ways, it has been used in almost every law enforcement agency. The paper aims to discuss the issue of racial profiling and why people dislike police.

This policy has been under constant debate that it promotes racial profiling; illegal stops and invades the privacy rights of individuals. This paper will discuss some of the landmark stop and frisks cases. The reasons for and against stop and frisk, then how it affects society. As Americans, we enjoy freedoms that many around the world do not.

Stop and Frisk 2 Abstract This paper will analyze the use of “Stop and Frisk” by the NYPD, and attempt to rationalize that this practice was based on a methodology of detecting behaviors which ultimately brought results in the reduction of crime, rather than a policy based on racial profiling.

College Essays-Stop and Frisk Stop and Frisk The U.S. Constitution ensures the rights of citizens, particularly against police and government intrusion. As part of that, the Fourth Amendment protects an individual’s right to be free from illegal search and seizure. Read More.

Essay on The Stop and Frisk Program within New York City Police Department.. - The judicial system in America has always endured much skepticism as to whether or not there is racial profiling amongst arrests. The stop and frisk policy of the NYPD has caused much controversy and publicity since being applied because of the clear racial.

Stop and frisk has been an NYPD tool for decades, but in recent years it has generated an increased amount of criticism and debate due to the alarming rate in which they occur communities of color, who often feel under attack and harassed by the police.

Nearly 90 percent of those being stopped are released without a summons or an arrest”. This is a clear example of why “Stop and Frisk” which causes more harm than good, should be abolished. The statistics clearly proves that “Stop and Frisk” is based off racial profiling, inefficient and must be abolished. In his article “Why Stop.

On the other hand, there have been thousands of cases where innocent citizens are stopped and arrested unreasonably, and in many cases there’s been suspicion of racial profiling being used. According to Joe Lhota, who approves of the policy, “stop, question and frisk keeps illegal guns off our city streets” and “helped to save thousands.